Legislature(2021 - 2022)
2022-04-20 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2022-04-20 House Journal Page 2589 HB 246 The following which was not taken up on the April 19 calendar (page 2567), was before the House in third reading: 2022-04-20 House Journal Page 2590 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 246(FIN) "An Act restricting the release of certain records of convictions; relating to misconduct involving marijuana by persons 18, 19, or 20 years of age; amending Rule 17(h), Alaska Rules of Minor Offense Procedure; and providing for an effective date." The question being: "Shall CSHB 246(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 246(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 30 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Cronk, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillham, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Josephson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, McCarty, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Prax, Rasmussen, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Carpenter, Eastman, Kurka, McCabe, McKay, Rauscher, Tilton, Vance Excused: Drummond, Patkotak And so, CSHB 246(FIN) passed the House. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There was objection. The question being: "Shall the court rule change be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 246(FIN) Third Reading Court Rule(s) YEAS: 32 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 2022-04-20 House Journal Page 2591 Yeas: Claman, Cronk, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillham, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Josephson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Carpenter, Eastman, Kurka, McKay, Tilton, Vance Excused: Drummond, Patkotak And so, the court rule change was adopted. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. Representative Eastman objected. The question being: "Shall the House adopt the effective date clause?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 246(FIN) Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 37 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Claman, Cronk, Eastman, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillham, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Josephson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Vance Excused: Drummond, Patkotak And so, the effective date clause was adopted. CSHB 246(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.